Ann Thorac Surg 2012;93:1522-1523. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.03.009
© 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Original Articles: Adult Cardiac
Invited Commentary
Anthony L. Estrera, MD
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, 6400 Fannin, Ste 2850, Houston, TX 77030
(Email: anthony.l.estrera@uth.tmc.edu).
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
In 1955, Burchell first recognized the therapeutic significance of the site of the tear in aortic dissection [1]. Subsequently, Hirst and colleagues [2] provided an anatomic description on aortic dissection in his comprehensive treatise in 1958. Soon after, Debakey and colleagues [3] reported an abridged version of the anatomic scheme and correlated each type with surgical outcome. From this, the Debakey classification differentiated the proximal (Debakey types I and II) from the distal aorta (Debakey types III and IV). Ultimately, Daily and associates [4] simplified further the classification of acute aortic dissection into Stanford type A (which involved the ascending aorta) and the Stanford type B, which was "limited to the descending thoracic aorta." The Stanford classification had implications on both management and prognosis. Because of . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Related Article
-
Total Arch Replacement With Stented Elephant Trunk Technique for Acute Type B Aortic Dissection Involving the Aortic Arch
- Hai-Peng Zhao, Jun-Ming Zhu, Wei-Guo Ma, Jun Zheng, Yong-Min Liu, and Li-Zhong Sun
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2012 93: 1517-1522.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
Copyright © 2012 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.