|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Cardiac Surgery, ZOL – Campus St-Jan, Schiepse Bos 6, Genk 3600, Belgium
(Email: robert.dion@zol.be).
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
The authors [1] have chosen to measure left ventricular reverse remodeling as a reduction in left ventricle end-systolic volume of greater than 15%. This may be a concern because echocardiography is not the best tool to measure ventricular volumes and sphericity.
As in our study [2], the lack of viability data can be considered a limitation; when viable myocardium subsists in a strategically important area of the ventricle, coronary revascularization may have a preponderant influence. On the other hand, when the ejection fraction is lower
Related Article
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008 85: 1319-1330.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |