|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:1262-1263
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 7GN-435, New York, NY 10032
(Email: rrd9001@nyp.org).
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Validation of scoring systems for specific clinical situations is valuable because it may guide decisions regarding the initiation of advanced invasive cardiac or respiratory support in addition to providing early prognostic information for realistic discussions with patients and families.
Lin and colleagues [1] compare the precision of five scoring systems in predicting hospital mortality in adult patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): (1) APACHE IV, (2) APACHE III, (3) APACHE II, (4) RIFLE, and (5) SOFA). Cardiogenic shock was the most
Related Article
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007 84: 1256-1262.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |