|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:891-892
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, PH-10 Stem, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 USA,
e-mail: djp@columbia.edu
Invited commentary
The current science of lung preservation is more of an "art" than a "science." Despite optimal care at harvest and meticulous surgical technique, lung grafts fail in as many as 15% of cases [1] for reasons that are often veiled. New strategies to improve on lung preservation would be a welcome addition in our battle to treat end-stage pulmonary disease with lung transplants, with the hope that improved preservation would translate into reduced morbidity and mortality for the lung graft recipient. Lung preservation practice patterns vary across
Related Article
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2000 69: 887-891.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |