|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:348
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Box 109 Houston, TX 77030-4095, USA
e-mail: jroth@mdanderson.org
Invited commentary
One of the most puzzling and troublesome aspects of treating patients with stage I lung cancer is the significant percentage of patients who recur following apparent complete resection of cancer detected at a relatively early stage. Clearly the biology of these tumors is different from other stage I cancers; however, our current staging tools are not precise enough to identify those patients who may well benefit from more aggressive multimodality treatment.
Related Article
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1999 68: 343-347.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |