|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1884-1885
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Room #812-CSB, 171 Ashley Ave, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
Invited commentary
The use of decision analysis is increasing in the surgical literature [1]. Because this method of research may be unfamiliar to clinicians, it is worthwhile to review the technique of decision analysis before commenting on this study. Decision analysis is useful when it is desirable to quantitatively compare alternative treatment strategies. As pointed out by Berkmeyer and Welch in their article, "A Readers Guide to Surgical Decision Analysis" [2], there are four basic components to a decision analysis. The first is the decision model, which specifies the alternative strategies and the outcomes associated with each strategy. Second, probabilities for each of these outcomes are estimated from the best available literature and assigned to each decision point in the model. Third, a value such as cost, patient preference, life expectancy, or quality adjusted life expectancy is
Related Article
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1998 66: 1876-1883.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |