ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
George T. Christakis
Bernard S. Goldman
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christakis, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christakis, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, B. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:933-934
© 1997 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Editorial

Do Small Aortic Valves Influence Long-Term Survival?

George T. Christakis, MD, Bernard S. Goldman, MD

Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

The study by Sawant and colleagues in this issue of The Annals [1] addresses the influence of small valves on long-term survival. Sawant and colleagues followed up 104 patients who received 19-mm St. Jude mechanical aortic valve replacements (mean of 5.48 ± 3.73 years), and demonstrated 5- and 10-year survival rates of 80.6% ± 8.3% and 61.6% ± 15.0%, respectively, similar to other reports of larger mechanical aortic valve prostheses. They also demonstrated that a body surface area of 1.7 m2 or greater was not a determinant of long-term mortality, suggesting that patient-prosthesis mismatch does not influence long-term outcome. Sawant and colleagues concluded that implantation of a 19-mm St. Jude mechanical prosthesis in small aortic roots is a reasonable alternative to other more complex procedures for inserting larger valves. Initially, their results and conclusions appear counterintuitive. However, the paucity of studies examining these issues requires that this report be more closely scrutinized.

As with most studies, review of the data by different investigators may lead to different conclusions. The 104 patients with 19-mm valves were selected from a population of 593 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, a "small valve" prevalence of 18%. This extremely high rate is inconsistent with other previously reported series, suggesting a selection bias or an unusual patient population, and that the conclusions are not generalizable.

See also page 964.

On close examination of the data, the reader will in fact discover significant selection bias and an inhomogeneous study group: the patients in this study are elderly (42% >= 70 years old), female (89%), and with . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article

Nineteen-Millimeter Aortic St. Jude Medical Heart Valve Prosthesis: Up to Sixteen Years' Follow-up
Dilip Sawant, Arun K. Singh, William C. Feng, Arthur A. Bert, and Fred Rotenberg
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1997 63: 964-970. [Abstract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
C. Amarelli, A. Della Corte, G. Romano, G. Iasevoli, G. Dialetto, L. S. De Santo, M. De Feo, M. Torella, M. Scardone, and M. Cotrufo
Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with 17-mm St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in isolated aortic stenosis
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2005; 129(3): 512 - 517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. D. Milano, M. De Carlo, G. Mecozzi, A. D'Alfonso, G. Scioti, C. Nardi, and U. Bortolotti
Clinical outcome in patients with 19-mm and 21-mm St. Jude aortic prostheses: comparison at long-term follow-up
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2002; 73(1): 37 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
V. Rao, G. T. Christakis, J. Sever, S. E. Fremes, G. Bhatnagar, G. Cohen, M. A. Borger, L. Abouzahr, and B. S. Goldman
A NOVEL COMPARISON OF STENTLESS VERSUS STENTED VALVES IN THE SMALL AORTIC ROOT
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 1999; 117(3): 431 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
U. Hvass, G. M. Palatianos, R. Frassani, C. Puricelli, and M. O'Brien
MULTICENTER STUDY OF STENTLESS VALVE REPLACEMENT IN THE SMALL AORTIC ROOT
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1999; 117(2): 267 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1997 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.