|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:479-480
© 1996 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
1520 South Dobson Rd, Suite 308, Mesa, AZ 85202,
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
See also page 475.
The significant number of patients who require primary or reoperative coronary artery bypass with limitation in available autogenous bypass graft conduit continues to stimulate the evaluation of a variety of graft sources. This article, as well as other recent studies that are referenced in it, justifies renewed enthusiasm for the radial artery graft, a conduit long avoided after discouraging reports by me and others two decades ago.
A reflection today on our early experience should
Related Article
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996 62: 475-479.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |