|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:620
© 1996 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Department of Surgery University of Coolorado Health Sciences Cente 2005 Franklin St, Suite 380 Denver, CO 80205-5476
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
See also page 615.
Aupart and colleagues have served an important purpose by putting second-generation pericardial valves into proper perspective. Although the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valve showed excellent hemodynamics [1], its ultimate failure to receive widespread acceptance was based on (1) a design problem using a rigid stent and a fixation suture at
Related Article
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996 61: 615-620.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |