ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:1176
© 1995 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Discussion

Discussion

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

See also page 1169.

DR THOMAS M. EGAN (Chapel Hill, NC): Did you look at the other lung? In other words, was there any evidence of microvascular injury to the other lung that was a result of your ischemic insult?

DR EPPINGER: We have looked at the other lung, and we are presently trying to characterize exactly what is going on in that lung. There is injury that happens to the nonischemic lung, but it is different from what goes on in the ischemic reperfused lung.

DR EGAN: Can you elaborate on that at all?

DR EPPINGER: There is no significant increase in the microvascular permeability using the radiolabeled albumin. There are other indices of injury in the lung, such as increased hemorrhage index in that . . . [Full Text of this Article]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1995 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.