|
|
||||||||
Department of Surgery, Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Hospital, Bandar Seri, Begawan, BA1710 Brunei Darussalam
(Email: chong_chee_fui@hotmail.com).
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
To the Editor:
I read with interest the article by Silberman and colleagues [1] regarding the comparison of flexible annuloplasty rings with rigid rings in ischemic mitral valve repair and the discussions that followed. Although there is some indirect evidence indicating that rigid annuloplasty rings may be better than flexible rings in restrictive mitral valve annuloplasty (RMVA) for ischemic mitral regurgitation, I do not believe that this article contributes to that evidence [1, 2]. There are several faults in the methodology of the article that seems to have been totally missed in
Related Article
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009 88: 2073-2074.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Silberman Reply Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2009; 88(6): 2073 - 2074. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |