|
|
||||||||
Department of Cardiac Surgery I, Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute, Milana Tepi
a 1, Belgrade, 11000 Serbia
(Email: nezic@eunet.rs).
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
To the Editor:
We read the article by Zacharias and colleagues [1] regarding the late results of conventional versus all-arterial revascularization based on internal thoracic and radial artery (RA) grafting with great interest. Although this is an outstanding article, we disagree with the authors' statement that several prospective and retrospective reports [2–4] have shown superior RA patency compared with saphenous vein grafts (SVG).
In the retrospective study, Zacharias and associates [2] used propensity scoring. Matched patients had essentially identical demographics, comorbidities, severity of coronary disease, and operative data. Although the
Related Article
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009 88: 1725.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Zacharias and R. H. Habib Reply Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2009; 88(5): 1725 - 1725. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |