|
|
||||||||
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center, 2221 Stockton Blvd, Room 2112, Sacramento, CA 95817-2214
(Email: davidt.cooke@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu).
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
To the Editor:
Chen and colleagues [1] should be commended for an interesting study. However, after measuring a single outcome, the substernal route may be shorter then the posterior mediastinal route as measured from a fixed pylorus to the cricoid cartilage, the authors make a leap to the definitive statement: "[esophageal] reconstruction by means of [anterior route] AR after esophagectomy should be considered as the preferable route if there are no other contraindications." The authors assume that distance is the only relevant factor when considering
Related Article
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009 88: 1391-1392.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Zhou and H. Chen Reply. Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2009; 88(4): 1391 - 1392. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |