ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:39. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.027
© 2009 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Donald D. Glower
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glower, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glower, D. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease

Original Articles: Adult Cardiac

Invited Commentary

Donald D. Glower, MD

Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3851, Durham, NC 27710

(Email: glowe001@mc.duke.edu).

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

I read with interest the article by Schwann and colleagues [1].

Now, some 45 years after the first reported coronary artery bypass graft, the debate still remains unsettled regarding selection of conduit in coronary artery bypass grafting. The surgeon has the choice of single grafting, sequential grafting, and Y-grafting or T-grafting techniques. Realistic conduit choices include internal mammary artery, radial artery, and autologous saphenous vein. Few adequately powered randomized trials have been . . . [Full Text of this Article]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.