|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heart, Lung, and Esophageal Surgical Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5200 Centre Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15232
(Email: landreneaurj@upmc.edu).
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Zhu and associates [1] give us a realistic account of the risk and rate of complications related to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) procedures anticipated among clinicians skilled in these approaches. Important messages related to lesion selection for RFA based on size, depth, and the relative relationship of the lesion to pulmonary hilar bronchovascular structures are also illuminated. The authors' commentary on patient selection for this compromise RFA approach to the otherwise resectable peripheral malignant pulmonary nodule is also appreciated.
This brings me to my concerns with the use of RFA among marginal candidates for anatomic pulmonary resection and the growing
Related Article
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009 87: 1023-1028.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |