|
|
||||||||
Department of Cardiothoracic-Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato, Via Morandi 30, San Donato Milanese, Milan, 20097 Italy
(Email: cardioanestesia@virgilio.it).
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
To the Editor:
I read with interest the recent article from Immer and coworkers [1] addressing the very relevant issue of minimal extracorporeal circulation (MEC) as a promising technique for improving the quality of outcomes after coronary operations. In this article, based on a retrospective comparison between patients treated with a MEC and a conventional group selected using a propensity score, the authors demonstrate that patients in the MEC group had a shorter mechanical ventilation time, intensive
Related Article
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009 87: 353.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Dobele, G. Schwirtz, B. Gahl, and F. Eckstein Mini ECC vs. conventional ECC: an examination of venous oxygen saturation, haemoglobin, haematocrit, flow, cardiac index and oxygen delivery Perfusion, May 1, 2010; 25(3): 125 - 131. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. F. Immer, M. Stalder, and T. P. Carrel Reply Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2009; 87(1): 353 - 353. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |