ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:288. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.09.066
© 2009 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nathan, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nathan, H. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other

New Technology

Invited Commentary

Howard J. Nathan, MD

Department of Anaesthesia, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, H341 HIRC, 40 Ruskin St, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4W7 Canada

(Email: hnathan@ottawaheart.ca).

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

I found the results of this relatively straightforward study somewhat surprising [1]. Raising the operating room temperature from 19° to 23°C combined with warming of intravenous fluids to 41°C and using a forced air convective system with a gel pad beneath the patient was as effective in maintaining bladder temperature above 36°C as the endovascular heating system. The author is to be commended for designing an effective procedure for the control group . . . [Full Text of this Article]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.