Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:1138. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.004
© 2008 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Original Articles: General Thoracic
Invited Commentary
Donald E. Low, MD
Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98111
(Email: gtsdel@vmmc.org).
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
The article by Roedl and colleagues [1] is a critical assessment using positron emission tomography (PET) and PET computed tomographic (CT) scan to quantify treatment response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, as well as local and systemic recurrence after definitive treatment. Both of these issues are important, and the authors have provided a new technique for gauging response to neoadjuvant therapy. The article suffers from two technical issues. The first being the fact that pathologic response (assessed as less than 10% remaining viable tumor cells) was not done by a designated subset of pathologists. More importantly, the second of three PET assessments, this one examining response of tumor length, was carried at a mean of 14 days . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Related Article
-
Assessment of Treatment Response and Recurrence in Esophageal Carcinoma Based on Tumor Length and Standardized Uptake Value on Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography
- Johannes B. Roedl, Mukesh G. Harisinghani, Rivka R. Colen, Alan J. Fischman, Michael A. Blake, Douglas J. Mathisen, and Peter R. Mueller
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008 86: 1131-1138.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
Copyright © 2008 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.