Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:2078. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.03.051
© 2008 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Original Articles: Pediatric Cardiac
Invited Commentary
Hideki Uemura, MD, FRCS
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney St, London SW3 6NP, United Kingdom
(Email: huemura-cvs@umin.ac.jp).
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
The authors [1] are to be congratulated for their invaluable report regarding the post-Ross rhythm issue. There has been enthusiasm for this particular procedure, but we can not deny that this is extensive surgery. Whenever choosing this attractive procedure, clinicians should precisely know the scientific truth. Apart from huge benefits, there are downsides. Regarding rhythms, several pairs of underlying factors are relevant. These include atrial versus ventricular arrhythmias, influence of surgical incisions versus functional and myocardial . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Related Article
-
Rhythm and Conduction Disturbances at Midterm Follow-up After the Ross Procedure in Infants, Children, and Young Adults
- Sara K. Pasquali, Bradley S. Marino, Jonathan R. Kaltman, Andrew J. Schissler, Gil Wernovsky, Meryl S. Cohen, Thomas L. Spray, and Ronn E. Tanel
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008 85: 2072-2078.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
Copyright © 2008 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.