ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koster, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Koster, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanical Circulatory Assistance
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:1423-1424
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Correspondence

Reply

Andreas Koster, MD

Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Department of Anesthesia, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353 Germany

(Email: koster@dhzb.de).

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

To the Editor:

Lappa and colleagues [1] commented on what they believe to be potentially misleading aspects of our article reporting on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in patients on ventricular assist device (VAD) support [2]. Some of these comments deserve discussion.

It was pointed out that the laboratory of Lappa and colleagues’ [1] institution observed cross-reactivity of certain proteins (ie, thyroglobulin, peroxidase) with the particle gel assay (PGIA) for anti-heparin/platelet factor 4 antibodies, potentially leading to false positive test results and consequential over-diagnosis of HIT in our study.

This is an interesting observation and we look forward to seeing these data published. It is well known that the current HIT antibody assays are sensitive but have limited specificity, although in this regard the PGIA seems to be superior to the ELISA. Indeed, the stronger the PGIA test result (e.g., result of 3 to 4* [a cutoff we employed]), the more specific the result for HIT [3]. Moreover, in view of these well-recognized limitations (and as outlined in the article), in all of our patients we also performed a "functional" HIT test, the heparin-induced platelet activation assay (HIPAA) (ie, a washed platelet assay for HIT that . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article

HIT in VAD Patients: Considerations
Angela Lappa, Patrizia Picozzi, Emilio D’Avino, Silvia Riondino, Antonio Menichetti, and Francesco Musumeci
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007 84: 1422-1423. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICVTSHome page
A. Joshi, D. Smith, M. Arora, and R. Poston
Anticoagulant monitoring in ventricular assist device patients: a feasibility study
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2008; 7(6): 1035 - 1038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.