|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:2337-2338
© 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Box 445, Houston, TX 77030-4009
(Email: drice@mdanderson.org).
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
To the Editor:
Doctor Aelony [1] raises several important points in his letter regarding our article [2]. Probably the most salient is that despite advances in chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery for mesothelioma, current therapeutic regimens are rarely curative. Nonetheless in highly selected patients treated with aggressive multimodality regimens, several authors have documented survival that exceeds that associated with the natural course of the disease in untreated patients [3, 4]. Prospective, randomized comparative data are currently lacking; however the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery (MARS) trial, now in pilot phase in Europe, will attempt to answer the question of whether survival is improved by chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy compared with chemotherapy and supportive care alone. Until the results of this important phase III trial are available (expected to be complete in the year 2012), we will continue to have to make treatment decisions based on
Related Article
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2006 82: 2337.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |