|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:1094
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Str 33, 48129 Münster, Germany
(E-mail: stefan.klotz@ukmuenster.de).
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
To the Editor:
We agree with Ündar and Myers that the energy equivalent pressure formula of Shepard and associates [1] is useful to quantify hemodynamic energy levels when comparing the different flow patterns of assist devices. However, this formula requires an arterial pressure wave that is possible to achieve only by using invasive methods. In our study [2], we used a protocol for evaluating and reevaluating transplant candidates, that is consistent with regulations of the European Transplant Organization (Eurotransplant, Leiden, the Netherlands). The protocol quantifies the contribution of the native left ventricle to total
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |