|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:448-449
© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Department of Surgery, UCLA School of Medicine, PO Box 951741, UCLA Medical Center, Room 62-215 CHS 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1741, USA
e-mail: rcameron@alumni.stanford.org
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
This work by Walles and colleagues arises out of the perpetual desire and need for a viable tracheal substitutethe Holy Grail of tracheal surgery. While tissue engineering approaches in this area of research are not new, data are accumulating that the scaffold structure as well as the source of seed cells are important determinants of success. Due to an incomplete understanding of the interactions between growing cells and their surrounding matrix, the process of engineering tissues that blend a system of structural support and airway functionality has proven extremely challenging.
In this article
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |