ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Thomas A. D'Amico
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by D'Amico, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by D'Amico, T. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer

Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:1902-1903
© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Invited commentary

Thomas A. D'Amico, MD

Duke University Medical Center Box 3496 Durham, NC 27710, USA

e-mail: damic001@mc.duke.edu

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Lobectomy has become the standard surgical management for patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), based on a report from the Lung Cancer Study Group that demonstrated improved recurrence-free survival, when compared to patients that underwent limited resection [1]. However, there may be patients with compromised pulmonary function in whom the relative benefit of lobectomy versus limited resection is outweighed by the relative risk. Patients in whom the risk-benefit analysis may be particularly important include patients with a higher risk from surgery, such as patients with restrictive lung disease [2], or patients with small peripheral nodules, in whom the relative benefits of lobectomy may not be as significant [3]. The process of preoperative risk stratification, therefore, is central to the choice of procedure [4].

Iizasa and colleagues analyze the prognostic value of preoperative pulmonary function in a series of patients who are treated with lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer [5]. The potential for this type of risk analysis is considerable: as screening with spiral CT becomes . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Iizasa and T. Fujisawa
Reply
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 79(6): 2198 - 2198.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.