|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:1902-1903
© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Duke University Medical Center Box 3496 Durham, NC 27710, USA
e-mail: damic001@mc.duke.edu
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Lobectomy has become the standard surgical management for patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), based on a report from the Lung Cancer Study Group that demonstrated improved recurrence-free survival, when compared to patients that underwent limited resection [1]. However, there may be patients with compromised pulmonary function in whom the relative benefit of lobectomy versus limited resection is outweighed by the relative risk. Patients in whom the risk-benefit analysis may be particularly important include patients with a higher risk from surgery, such as patients with restrictive lung disease [2], or patients with small peripheral nodules, in whom the relative benefits of lobectomy may not be as significant [3]. The process of preoperative risk stratification, therefore, is central to the choice of procedure [4].
Iizasa and colleagues analyze the prognostic value of preoperative pulmonary function in a series of patients who are treated with lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer [5]. The potential for this type of risk analysis is considerable: as screening with spiral CT becomes
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Iizasa and T. Fujisawa Reply Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 79(6): 2198 - 2198. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |