ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Robert M. Mentzer, Jr
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mentzer, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mentzer, R. M., Jr

Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:356-357
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Editorial

Ischemic preconditioning: how close are we to therapeutic implementation?

Robert M. Mentzer, Jr, MDa

a Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA

Address reprint requests to Dr Mentzer, Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose St, MN264, Lexington, KY 40536-0298
e-mail: mentzer@pop.uky.edu

It is well established experimentally that a brief interval of ischemic stress prior to a period of prolonged ischemia enhances the tolerance of the heart to the insult. This phenomenon, known by the term ischemic preconditioning (IPC), is not confined to the heart and is currently under intense investigation in other organs as well, eg, the brain, skeletal muscle, and the liver. In the heart, this increased tolerance is manifested as a reduction in ventricular arrhythmias and infarct size. Metabolically, it is associated with reduced rates of myocardial adenosine triphosphate (ATP) depletion and interstitial adenosine accumulation.

Despite the fact that classic IPC is one of the most potent methods for lessening infarct size, several aspects of the phenomenon limit direct clinical applicability. The timing of the conditioning event appears to be important, ie, the stimulus must be applied at least 3 minutes prior to the prolonged occlusion. Repeated episodes at short intervals do not enhance the degree of protection; the protection is short-lived and usually disappears within 2 to 3 hours. Ischemic preconditioning can be renewed, but tolerance develops within a short time. Finally, although a decrease in postoperative ventricular arrhythmias and a reduction in infarct size is desirable, a much more . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. J. Canyon and G. P. Dobson
Pretreatment with an adenosine A1 receptor agonist and lidocaine: A possible alternative to myocardial ischemic preconditioning
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2005; 130(2): 371 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2000 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.