HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Alessandro Parolari Marco Zanobini Massimo Porqueddu Maurizio Roberto Francesco Alamanni Paolo Biglioli Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Parolari, A. Articles by Biglioli, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Parolari, A. Articles by Biglioli, P. Related Collections Myocardial infarction Related Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:2009-2016
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Surgery of Left Ventricular Aneurysm: A Meta-Analysis of Early Outcomes Following Different Reconstruction Techniques

^a Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
^b Department of Pharmacological Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

Accepted for publication January 22, 2007.

^_* Address correspondence to Dr Parolari, Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Milan, Centro Cardiologico-Fondazione Monzino IRCCS, Via Parea 4, Milan, 20138, Italy (Email: alessandro.parolari{at}cardiologicomonzino.it).

Background: The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of linear and geometric left ventricular aneurysm reconstruction on early postoperative outcomes.

Methods: A search of computerized databases supplemented with manual bibliographic review was performed for all peer-reviewed English language publications concerning randomized and nonrandomized studies reporting the results of left ventricular reconstruction after both linear and geometric reconstruction techniques. Meta-analyses of several short-term outcomes were performed.

Results: No randomized trial was identified. Eighteen nonrandomized trials were found with a total of 1,814 and 803 patients who underwent linear and geometric reconstruction, respectively. Meta-analysis of all studies (n = 18) revealed an increased risk of in-hospital death for patients undergoing linear reconstruction (relative risk = 1.59, 95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 2.26, p = 0.01). The subanalysis of studies in which linear reconstruction was adopted mainly in the first period of time, and geometric reconstruction was adopted in a later phase, still showed a significant advantage in terms of in-hospital mortality for patients undergoing geometric reconstruction (n = 11 studies, relative risk = 1.89, 95% confidence interval: 1.22 to 2.93, p = 0.004). By contrast, when the two surgical approaches were carried out in the same time lag, there was no difference between linear and geometric reconstruction techniques (n = 7 studies, relative risk = 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 0.57 to 1.92, p = 0.89). No differences in the other outcomes of interest were observed.

Conclusions: The advantage for geometric reconstruction techniques in terms of in-hospital mortality shown in some studies can be an effect of learning curve or of improvement over time in management of these difficult patients. Further studies are required to clarify this issue.

Related Article

Invited commentary

William Anderson
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007 83: 2016. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Anderson Invited commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 83(6): 2016 - 2016. [Full Text] [PDF]