ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Massimo Bonacchi
Edvin Prifti
Gabriele Giunti
Guido Sani
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonacchi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sani, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bonacchi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sani, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:460-465
© 2002 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study

Massimo Bonacchi, MD*a, Edvin Prifti, MDb, Gabriele Giunti, MDa, Giacomo Frati, MDb, Guido Sani, MDa

a Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
b I.R.C.C.S Neuromed, Isernia, Italy

Accepted for publication October 15, 2001.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Bonacchi, Cattedra di Cardiochirurgia, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni, 85, 50134 Careggi, Florence, Italy
e-mail: mbonacchi{at}hotmail.com

Background. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative outcome obtained in patients undergoing elective aortic valve operation, either through ministernotomy or conventional sternotomy.

Methods. Between January 1999 and July 2001, 80 consecutive patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement were randomly divided into two groups: group I (n = 40 patients) undergoing a ministernotomy approach (reversed-C or reversed-L), and group II (n = 40 patients) undergoing conventional sternotomy.

Results. The length of skin incision was significantly shorter in group I than in group II (8.2 ± 1.3 cm versus 23.7 ± 2.6 cm, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in cardiopulmonary bypass duration, associated procedures, or aortic cross-clamping times. Total operating time was 3.7 ± 0.46 hours in group I compared with 3.4 ± 0.6 hours in group II (p = 0.014). A similar incidence of cardiac, neurologic, infective, and renal complications between groups was found. Mean mediastinal drainage and mean blood transfusions (amount of blood transfused) per patient were greater in group II (p < 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). Twenty-five (62.5%) patients in group II and 15 (37.5%) patients in group I required postoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.04). Mechanical ventilation time was significantly longer in group II (6.2 ± 1.8 hours versus 4.4 ± 0.9 hours, p = 0.006). Five days after the surgical procedure, spirometric data analysis demonstrated a significantly lower total lung capacity and maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressures in group II compared with group I (p = 0.003, p = 0.007, and p < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions. Our results showed that ministernotomy had not only important cosmetic advantages but also beneficial effects in blood loss and transfusion, postoperative pain, and probably in sternal stability. Ministernotomy also improved recovery of respiratory function and allowed earlier extubation and hospital discharge.


Related Article

Invited commentary
Alejandro Aris
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2002 73: 465-466. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Tabata, R. Umakanthan, L. H. Cohn, R. M. Bolman III, P. S. Shekar, F. Y. Chen, G. S. Couper, and S. F. Aranki
Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve operations
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 33(4): 537 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. Murtuza, J. R. Pepper, R. DeL Stanbridge, C. Jones, C. Rao, A. Darzi, and T. Athanasiou
Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement: Is It Worth It?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 1121 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
P. S. Shekar and L. H. Cohn
Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 957 - 964.
[Full Text]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
M. A Moustafa, A. A Abdelsamad, G. Zakaria, and M. M Omarah
Minimal vs Median Sternotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2007; 15(6): 472 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Tabata, Z. Khalpey, S. F. Aranki, G. S. Couper, L. H. Cohn, and P. S. Shekar
Minimal Access Surgery of Ascending and Proximal Arch of the Aorta: A 9-Year Experience
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2007; 84(1): 67 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Tabata, R. Umakanthan, Z. Khalpey, S. F. Aranki, G. S. Couper, L. H. Cohn, and P. S. Shekar
Conversion to full sternotomy during minimal-access cardiac surgery: Reasons and results during a 9.5-year experience
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2007; 134(1): 165 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
M. Tabata, S. F Aranki, J. A Fox, G. S Couper, L. H Cohn, and P. S Shekar
Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement in Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, June 1, 2007; 15(3): 225 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
V. M. Hsu, P. Atluri, M. G. Keane, and Y. J. Woo
Minimally invasive aortic valve papillary fibroelastoma resection
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2006; 5(6): 779 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MMCTSHome page
M. Glauber, A. Farneti, M. Solinas, and J. Karimov
Aortic valve replacement through a right minithoracotomy
MMCTS, November 10, 2006; 2006(1110): 1826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
I. Bakir, F. P. Casselman, F. Wellens, H. Jeanmart, R. De Geest, I. Degrieck, F. Van Praet, Y. Vermeulen, and H. Vanermen
Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 81(5): 1599 - 1604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. Luciani, A. Anselmi, M. Gaudino, G. Nasso, F. Glieca, L. Martinelli, F. Santarelli, M. Perisano, and G. Possati
Harmonic Scalpel Reduces Bleeding and Postoperative Complications in Redo Cardiac Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 934 - 938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
C. Weissman
Pulmonary Complications After Cardiac Surgery
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2004; 8(3): 185 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
J.-M. De Smet, B. Rondelet, J.-L. Jansens, M. Antoine, D. De Canniere, and J.-L. Le Clerc
Assessment Based on EuroSCORE of Ministernotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2004; 12(1): 53 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. C. Stamou, E. I. Kapetanakis, R. Lowery, K. A. Jablonski, T. L. Frankel, and P. J. Corso
Allogeneic blood transfusion requirements after minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a risk-Adjusted analysis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 76(4): 1101 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. K.W. Sim and R. T. Grignani
Lesser impairment of respiratory function is the mechanism of faster recovery after partial sternotomy for valve replacement
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2003; 75(4): 1360 - 1360.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Bonacchi, E. Prifti, G. Giunti, and G. Sani
Lesser impairment of respiratory function is the mechanism of faster recovery after partial sternotomy for valve replacement: Reply
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2003; 75(4): 1360 - 1361.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J.-F. Legare, K. J. Buth, R. C. Arora, D. A. Murphy, J. A. Sullivan, and G. M. Hirsch
The dome of the left atrium: an alternative approach for mitral valve repair
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2003; 23(3): 272 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
W. R. Chitwood Jr. and L. W. Nifong
Minimally Invasive and Robotic Valve Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1075 - 1092.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2002 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.