ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


  Click here to read this article as a CME activity


Ann Thorac Surg 2012;93:1027-1032. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.06.007
© 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Scott J. Swanson
Bryan F. Meyers
John A. Howington
Michael A. Maddaus
Robert J. McKenna
Daniel L. Miller
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer


Original Articles: General Thoracic

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Is Less Costly and Morbid Than Open Lobectomy: A Retrospective Multiinstitutional Database Analysis

Scott J. Swanson, MDa,*, Bryan F. Meyers, MDb, Candace L. Gunnarsson, EdDc, Matthew Moore, MHAd, John A. Howington, MDe, Michael A. Maddaus, MDf, Robert J. McKenna, MDg, Daniel L. Miller, MDh

a Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
b Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
c S2 Statistical Solutions, Inc, Cincinnati, Ohio
d Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc, Cincinnati, Ohio
e Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, Evanston, Illinois
f Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Duluth, Minnesota
g Division of Thoracic Surgery, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
h Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University Clinic, Atlanta, Georgia

Accepted for publication June 1, 2011.

* Address correspondence to Dr Swanson, Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (Email: sjswanson{at}partners.org).

Presented at the Poster Session of the Forty-seventh Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Diego, CA, Jan 31–Feb 2, 2011.

Background: The Premier Perspective Database (Premier Inc, Charlotte, NC) was used to compare hospital costs and perioperative outcomes for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and open lobectomy procedures in the United States.

Methods: Eligible patients underwent a lobectomy for cancer by a thoracic surgeon, by VATS or open thoracotomy and were captured in the database between third quarter of 2007 and through 2008. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for binary outcomes. Ordinary least-squares regressions were used to estimate continuous outcomes. All models were adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics.

Results: A total of 3,961 patients underwent a lobectomy by a thoracic surgeon by open (n = 2,907) or VATS (n = 1,054) approach. Hospital costs were higher for open versus VATS; $21,016 versus $20,316 (p = 0.027). Adjustment for surgeon experience with VATS over the 6 months prior to each operation showed a significant association between surgeon experience and cost. Average costs ranged from $22,050 for low volume surgeons to $18,133 for high volume surgeons. For open lobectomies, cost differences by surgeon experience were not significant and both levels were estimated at $21,000. Length of stay was 7.83 versus 6.15 days, for open versus VATS (p = 0.000). Surgery duration was shorter for open procedures at 3.75 versus 4.09 for VATS (p = 0.000). The risk of adverse events was significantly lower in the VATS group, odds ratio of 1.22 (p = 0.019).

Conclusions: Lobectomy performed by the VATS approach as compared with an open technique results in shorter length of stay, fewer adverse events, and less cost to the hospital. Economic impact is magnified as the surgeon's experience increases.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Interact CardioVasc Thorac SurgHome page
L. Konge, R. H. Petersen, H. J. Hansen, and C. Ringsted
No extensive experience in open procedures is needed to learn lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery
Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, December 1, 2012; 15(6): 961 - 965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cleveland Clinic Journal of MedicineHome page
S. MURTHY
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for the treatment of lung cancer
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, May 1, 2012; 79(e-Suppl_1): e-S23 - e-S25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2012 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.