HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Niv Ad Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ad, N. Articles by Holmes, S. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ad, N. Articles by Holmes, S. D. Related Collections Electrophysiology - arrhythmias

---

Original Articles: Adult Cardiac

The Outcome of the Cox Maze Procedure in Patients With Previous Percutaneous Catheter Ablation to Treat Atrial Fibrillation

Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia

Accepted for publication January 12, 2011.

^_* Address correspondence to Dr Ad, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, 3300 Gallows Rd, Falls Church, VA 22042 (Email: niv.ad{at}inova.org).

Presented at the Fifty-seventh Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Orlando, FL, Nov 3–6, 2010.

Background: Surgical ablation may be performed on symptomatic patients who failed catheter ablation. We investigated the outcomes of patients who presented for Cox Maze III/IV procedure (CM III/IV) after failing at least one left-sided ablation.

Methods: Forty patients were identified as having had at least one left-sided ablation (mean 2.3 ablations per patient). Rhythm was verified using electrocardiograms and 24-hour Holter monitoring. Health-related Quality of life (HRQL) (SF-12) and the Symptom Frequency and Severity Checklist were collected before surgery and postoperatively.

Results: The majority of patients (N = 38) presented with long standing persistent atrial fibrillation (mean, 50.16 months). There was 1 operative death, 1 noncardiac death in late follow-up (mean, 25.5 months), and no embolic strokes. The return to sinus rhythm off class I/III antiarrhythmic drugs at 6, 12, and 24 months was 76% (29/38), 89% (23/26), 93% (13/14), respectively: 7 patients required cardioversion; 4 patients required another ablation. For every additional ablation before surgery, there was almost 4 times greater odds of receiving a follow-up intervention (OR = 3.58, p = 0.02, CI: 1.21–10.56). Exit block was tested on 96 previously ablated pulmonary veins and 91 (95%) were found to conduct. HRQL and symptom/severity scores improved significantly postoperatively (p = 0.02)/(p = 0.03), respectively.

Conclusions: Surgical ablation following failed catheter ablation is safe and effective. Over 90% of the tested pulmonary veins were not isolated at time of surgery questioning the validity of documented acute conduction block during catheter ablation. Increase in the number of ablations before the surgical ablation may be related to inferior outcomes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Ad The challenge of defining procedural endpoints for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 1, 2012; 41(1): 119 - 120. [Full Text] [PDF]