HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Rebecca P. Petersen Mani A. Daneshmand Joseph W. Turek Shu S. Lin Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Atkins, B. Z. Articles by Davis, R. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Atkins, B. Z. Articles by Davis, R. D., Jr Related Collections Lung - transplantation

---

Original Articles: General Thoracic

Impact of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia on Long-Term Outcomes of Lung Transplantation

^a Department of Surgery, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
^b Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
^c Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington

Accepted for publication June 18, 2010.

^_* Address correspondence to Dr Atkins, 508 Fulton St #112, Durham, NC 27705 (Email: broadus.atkins{at}va.gov).

Presented at the Poster Session of the Forty-sixth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Jan 25–27, 2010.

Background: Lung transplantation, definitive therapy for end-stage lung disease, is limited long-term by allograft dysfunction including bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). Few modifiable risk factors for pulmonary transplant-related mortality are recognized. However, oropharyngeal dysphagia frequently occurs after thoracic surgical procedures, including lung transplantation, and increases morbidity. We evaluated the impact of oropharyngeal dysphagia on survival and BOS after lung transplantation.

Methods: A total of 263 consecutive lung transplant patients were reviewed. Each underwent clinical swallowing evaluation early after surgery; 149 patients underwent additional fiberoptic or videofluoroscopic swallowing evaluation (SE). Results of SE were correlated with BOS, defined by accepted criteria, and mortality using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Cox proportional hazard modeling assessed preoperative and postoperative variables associated with development of BOS and mortality.

Results: Mean follow-up was 920 ± 560 days. The SE identified tracheal aspiration and (or) laryngeal penetration in 70.5%. Preoperative tobacco abuse, gastroesophageal reflux, and cardiopulmonary bypass independently predicted oropharyngeal dysphagia. Peak FEV₁ (forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration) alone independently predicted BOS (hazard ratio 0.98; confidence interval 0.975 to 0.992, p < 0.0001); oropharyngeal dysphagia was not associated with BOS. Independent predictors of mortality by multivariable analysis were ventilator dependence (p = 0.038) and peak FEV₁ (p < 0.0001); normal SE was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio 0.13; confidence interval 0.03 to 0.54, p = 0.03).

Conclusions: Oropharyngeal dysphagia, often overlooked on clinical examination, is common after lung transplantation. Normal deglutition may improve survival after lung transplantation, but oropharyngeal dysphagia does not independently affect BOS. Institution of protocols aimed at identifying previously unrecognized dysphagia may improve results of pulmonary transplantation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. L. Willner, P. Hugenholtz, S. T. Yerkovich, M. E. Tan, J. N. Daly, N. Lachner, P. M. Hopkins, and D. C. Chambers Reestablishment of Recipient-associated Microbiota in the Lung Allograft Is Linked to Reduced Risk of Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome , March 15, 2013; 187(6): 640 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Parmar, R. Venkateswaran, and J. Wallwork Invited Commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2010; 90(5): 1628 - 1629. [Full Text] [PDF]