HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Robert L. Kormos Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Santelices, L. C. Articles by Antaki, J. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Santelices, L. C. Articles by Antaki, J. F. Related Collections Mechanical Circulatory Assistance Related Article

---

Original Articles: Adult Cardiac

Development of a Hybrid Decision Support Model for Optimal Ventricular Assist Device Weaning

^a Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
^d School of Information Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
^b Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
^c Artificial Heart Program, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Accepted for publication March 26, 2010.

^_* Address correspondence to Dr Antaki, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 700 Technology Dr, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 (Email: antaki{at}andrew.cmu.edu).

Background: Despite the small but promising body of evidence for cardiac recovery in patients that have received ventricular assist device (VAD) support, the criteria for identifying and selecting candidates who might be weaned from a VAD have not been established.

Methods: A clinical decision support system was developed based on a Bayesian Belief Network that combined expert knowledge with multivariate statistical analysis. Expert knowledge was derived from interviews of 11 members of the Artificial Heart Program at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. This was supplemented by retrospective clinical data from the 19 VAD patients considered for weaning between 1996 and 2004. Artificial Neural Networks and Natural Language Processing were used to mine these data and extract sensitive variables.

Results: Three decision support models were compared. The model exclusively based on expert-derived knowledge was the least accurate and most conservative. It underestimated the incidence of heart recovery, incorrectly identifying 4 of the successfully weaned patients as transplant candidates. The model derived exclusively from clinical data performed better but misidentified 2 patients: 1 weaned successfully, and 1 that needed a cardiac transplant ultimately. An expert-data hybrid model performed best, with 94.74% accuracy and 75.37% to 99.07% confidence interval, misidentifying only 1 patient weaned from support.

Conclusions: A clinical decision support system may facilitate and improve the identification of VAD patients who are candidates for cardiac recovery and may benefit from VAD removal. It could be potentially used to translate success of active centers to those less established and thereby expand use of VAD therapy.

Related Article

Invited Commentary

Hari R. Mallidi
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2010 90: 720-721. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. F. Antaki Insanity of Left Ventricular Assist Therapy: Doing the Same Thing and Expecting Different Results Circ Heart Fail, November 1, 2011; 4(6): 680 - 681. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. R. Mallidi Invited Commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2010; 90(3): 720 - 721. [Full Text] [PDF]