|
|
||||||||
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Accepted for publication September 15, 2009.
* Address correspondence to Dr Hughes, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Box 3051, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710 (Email: gchad.hughes{at}duke.edu).
Presented at the Fifty-fifth Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Austin, TX, Nov 5–8, 2008.
Background: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for the management of type B aortic dissections has become more commonplace despite some controversy. Results of endovascular management of complicated acute (<2 weeks from symptom onset) and chronic (>2 weeks) type B aortic dissection with a view towards determining safety, efficacy, and requirement for secondary procedures are reviewed.
Methods: Between June 2005 and November 2008, 55 patients (41 men) with a mean age of 59 ± 12 years (range, 31 to 77 years) underwent TEVAR for the management of complicated acute (n = 22) or chronic (n = 33) type B dissection. Indications in acute dissection included impending or frank rupture in 11 and malperfusion syndromes in 11; the indication in chronic dissections was aneurysmal degeneration in 33.
Results: Primary technical success was 100%. In-hospital and 30-day rates of death, stroke, and permanent paraplegia/paresis were 2% (n = 1), 0%, and 2% (n = 1), respectively. Median follow-up was 7.1 months (range, 1 to 38 months). Overall actuarial midterm survival was 63% at 38 months, with an aorta-specific actuarial survival of 94%. Two patients (4%) required late conversion to open repair. Postoperative type I or III endoleak occurred in 3 (6%) and type II endoleak in 7 (15%). Two patients underwent subsequent endovascular occlusion. The composite reintervention rate in follow-up was 23.4% (n = 13).
Conclusions: Endovascular repair for complicated acute and chronic type B dissection is safe and effective at early midterm follow-up. TEVAR for type B dissection requires more secondary interventions and imaging surveillance than conventional open reconstruction. Longer-term follow-up is needed to determine the durability of this approach.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Di Eusanio, A. Armaro, L. Di Marco, D. Pacini, C. Savini, S. Martin Suarez, E. Pilato, and R. Di Bartolomeo Short- and midterm results after hybrid treatment of chronic aortic dissection with the frozen elephant trunk technique Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, October 1, 2011; 40(4): 875 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Parsa, J. B. Williams, S. D. Bhattacharya, W. G. Wolfe, M. A. Daneshmand, R. L. McCann, and G. C. Hughes Midterm results with thoracic endovascular aortic repair for chronic type B aortic dissection with associated aneurysm. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2011; 141(2): 322 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Czerny, S. Roedler, S. Fakhimi, G. Sodeck, M. Funovics, J. Dumfarth, J. Holfeld, M. Schoder, A. Juraszek, T. Dziodzio, et al. Midterm Results of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Patients With Aneurysms Involving the Descending Aorta Originating From Chronic Type B Dissections Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2010; 90(1): 90 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |