HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Philip A.R. Hayward George S. Matalanis Siven Seevanayagam Alexander Rosalion Brian F. Buxton Permission Requests Google Scholar Articles by Hadinata, I. E. Articles by Buxton, B. F. PubMed Articles by Hadinata, I. E. Articles by Buxton, B. F. Related Collections Coronary disease

---

Original Articles: Adult Cardiac

Choice of Conduit for the Right Coronary System: 8-Year Analysis of Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes Trial

^a University of Melbourne Medical School, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
^b Department of Cardiac Surgery, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia
^c Department of Cardiology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia
^d Victorian Heart Centre, Richmond, Victoria, Australia

Accepted for publication June 4, 2009.

^_* Address correspondence to Prof Buxton, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australia (Email: brianbuxton{at}ozemail.com.au).

Background: Previous reports have supported the use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries to revascularize the left coronary circulation. If this becomes standardized practice, the optimal conduit for the right coronary system remains to be established. Our objective is to compare the performance of the radial artery versus the saphenous vein when used to graft the right coronary artery or its branches during an 8-year period after primary coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Methods: The Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes study is a randomized controlled trial comparing radial artery, saphenous vein, and free right internal thoracic artery. Of the 621 patients enrolled in the study, 465 patients received a graft to the right coronary artery or its branches. The retrospectively compiled database was used to establish patency rates and clinical events among these patients.

Results: Absolute graft patency rates were as follows: radial artery, 86.9% of 68 (95% confidence interval, 76.6% to 93.1%); and saphenous vein, 81.2% of 197 (95% confidence interval, 75.1% to 86.1%). Noninferiority tests show that absolute radial patency to saphenous patency is at least 0.9526 (p = 0.025). Kaplan-Meier estimates of angiographic outcomes show no significant difference (log rank p = 0.22). Cardiac events in the right coronary territory occurred in the radial artery group (1.79%) versus the saphenous vein group (4.93%; p = 0.26). Overall mortality was 8.03% in the radial artery group versus 12.5% in the saphenous vein group (p = 0.23).

Conclusions: The radial artery patency is at least comparable to that of the saphenous vein when grafted to the right coronary artery or its branches. The paucity of clinical events in both grafts is notable. Selection of best conduit may therefore be made according to other factors.