ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:930-936. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.06.013
© 2009 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Robert J. Cerfolio
Ayesha S. Bryant
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cerfolio, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, A. S.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cerfolio, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, A. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer


Original Articles: General Thoracic

Changes in Pulmonary Function Tests After Neoadjuvant Therapy Predict Postoperative Complications

Robert J. Cerfolio, MD, FACS, Amar Talati, BS, Ayesha S. Bryant, MSPH, MD*

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama

Accepted for publication June 4, 2009.

* Address correspondence to Dr Bryant, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 703 19th St S, ZRB 739, Birmingham, AL 35294 (Email: abryant{at}uab.edu).

Presented at the Forty-fifth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Francisco, CA, Jan 26–28, 2009.

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy increases the risk of pulmonary resection. Changes in specific pulmonary function tests may be predictive.

Methods: A retrospective review of a prospective database of patients with non–small cell lung cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy, had pulmonary function tests performed both before and after therapy, and then underwent elective pulmonary resection was performed. Final values and change in the pulmonary function tests before and after treatment were entered as independent variables into a multivariate model in which the dependent variable was major or respiratory morbidity.

Results: There were 132 patients. The mean duration between pretherapy and posttherapy pulmonary function tests was 4.1 months. The mean change in the percent forced expiratory volume in 1 second, in the percent diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, and in the percent diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide corrected for the alveolar volume was +1.0, –6.4%, and –6.6%, respectively. Fifty-five patients (42%) experienced a postoperative complication, and 39 of those patients experienced a major or respiratory complication. There were 7 (5.3%) operative mortalities (5 were respiratory related). On multivariate analysis the change in the percent diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide corrected for the alveolar volume was the only factor associated with major or respiratory morbidity (p = 0.028). When the posttherapy percent diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide corrected for the alveolar volume fell by 8% or more, there was an increased likelihood of major morbidity (p = 0.01).

Conclusions: A decrease in the percent diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide corrected for the alveolar volume after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy may predict increased risk for pulmonary resection, especially if the decrease is 8% or greater. These results should be considered in the preoperative risk assessment of patients who are to undergo pulmonary resection after induction therapy.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.