ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


  Click here to read this article as a CME activity


Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:711-718. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.007
© 2009 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Jonathan W. Haft
Francis D. Pagani
Matthew A. Romano
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haft, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, J. C.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Haft, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, J. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanical Circulatory Assistance


Original Articles: Adult Cardiac

Short- and Long-Term Survival of Patients Transferred to a Tertiary Care Center on Temporary Extracorporeal Circulatory Support

Jonathan W. Haft, MDa,*, Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhDa, Matthew A. Romano, MDa, Christina L. Leventhal, MSa, D. Bradley Dyke, MDb, Jennifer C. Matthews, MDb

a Section of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
b Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Accepted for publication April 1, 2009.

* Address correspondence to Dr Haft, Cardiovascular Center 5144, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (Email: haft{at}umich.edu).

Presented at the Forty-fifth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Francisco, CA, Jan 26–28, 2009.

Background: Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with temporary, extracorporeal assist devices restores hemodynamics in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. These devices are frequently used in community hospitals, with subsequent referral to tertiary care centers. We sought to determine the outcomes of such referrals and identify prognostic variables that may influence management decisions.

Methods: We performed a single-institution retrospective review of 59 consecutive patients transferred on temporary, extracorporeal MCS from 1997 to 2008. Demographics, medical history, laboratory data, and clinical status were obtained, with survival determined from the medical record and the Social Security Death Index. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed and survival estimates were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: Median age was 49.6 years (range, 14 to 77 years). Forty-five patients (76%) were supported for postcardiotomy failure, and 34 (58%) required biventricular support. Twenty-five (42%) survived to hospital discharge, 11 after cardiac recovery (44%), 9 with long-term implantable MCS devices (39%), and 5 after heart transplantation (22%). Eight patients discharged with implantable MCS devices underwent heart transplantation and 1 remains alive on long-term implantable MCS support. Survival was 42% ± 6% at 1 year and 38% ± 6% at 5 years. Age and renal function were independent predictors of death.

Conclusions: Nearly half of all patients transferred on temporary extracorporeal MCS survive to discharge. Most of the long-term survivors received a heart transplant. Age and renal function were independent predictors of death, suggesting that survival is maximized by considering eligibility for cardiac transplantation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.