|
|
||||||||
a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Center Munich at the Technical University, Munich, Germany
b Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
c Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
d Sana Herzchirurgische Klinik, Stuttgart, Germany
e German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
f Department of Mathematics, School of Science and Technology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
Accepted for publication April 22, 2009.
* Address correspondence to Dr Hörer, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Center Munich at the Technical University, Lazarettstrasse 36, Munich, D-80636, Germany (Email: hoerer{at}dhm.mhn.de).
Presented at the Forty-fifth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Francisco, CA, Jan 26–28, 2009.
Background: For children who require aortic valve replacement, the Ross operation provides a unique advantage of growth potential of the pulmonary autograft in the aortic position. This study assessed the progression of autograft root diameters and its effect on aortic regurgitation (AR).
Methods: Neoaortic echo dimensions from 48 children (<16 years) undergoing Ross operation who had follow-up echocardiograms before age 20 were analyzed (mean follow-up, 5.1 ± 3.3 years).
Results: The mean age at the time of the Ross operation was 10.0 ± 4.3 years. Mean z values of the neoaortic annulus (1.5 ± 0.4), sinus (2.5 ± 0.4), and sinotubular junction (2.6 ± 0.9) when the autograft was implanted were significantly larger compared with normal values (p < 0.001, all). The mean z values significantly increased with follow-up at the level of the sinus (0.5 ± 0.1/year, p < 0.001) and the sinotubular junction (0.7 ± 0.2, p < 0.001), but not at the level of the annulus (0.1 ± 0.1, p = 0.59). AR increased with follow-up time (0.07 ± 0.02 grade/year, p < 0.001). AR increased with sinotubular junction diameter (p = 0.028), but there was not significant evidence of an association with annulus diameter (p = 0.25) or sinus diameter (p = 0.40).
Conclusions: Children undergoing Ross operation have larger neoaortic root dimensions than healthy children. Growth of the annulus matches somatic growth. The diameters of the sinus and the sinotubular junction increase significantly relative to somatic growth. The latter may explain the development of AR.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. M. Mokhles, H. Kortke, U. Stierle, O. Wagner, E. I. Charitos, A. J. J. C. Bogers, J. Gummert, H.-H. Sievers, and J. J. M. Takkenberg Survival Comparison of the Ross Procedure and Mechanical Valve Replacement With Optimal Self-Management Anticoagulation Therapy: Propensity-Matched Cohort Study Circulation, January 4, 2011; 123(1): 31 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Frigiola, A. Varrica, A. Satriano, A. Giamberti, G. Pome, R. Abella, M. Carminati, C. Carlucci, M. Ranucci, and Surgical and Clinical Outcome REsearch (SCORE) Gro Neoaortic Valve and Root Complex Evolution After Ross Operation in Infants, Children, and Adolescents Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2010; 90(4): 1278 - 1285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-H. Sievers, U. Stierle, E. I. Charitos, T. Hanke, M. Misfeld, J. F. Matthias Bechtel, A. Gorski, U. F. W. Franke, B. Graf, D. R. Robinson, et al. Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events After the Ross Procedure: A Report From the German-Dutch Ross Registry Circulation, September 14, 2010; 122(11_suppl_1): S216 - S223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Brown, M. Ruzmetov, A. P. Shahriari, M. D. Rodefeld, Y. Mahomed, and M. W. Turrentine Modification of the Ross aortic valve replacement to prevent late autograft dilatation Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, May 1, 2010; 37(5): 1002 - 1007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. W. Michalak, J. A. Moll, M. Moll, K. Mludzik, and J. J. Moll Neoaortic Valve Function 10 to 18 Years After Arterial Switch Operation World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery, April 1, 2010; 1(1): 51 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |