ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:S2-S22. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.053
© 2009 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
David M. Shahian
Sean M. O'Brien
Giovanni Filardo
Victor A. Ferraris
Constance K. Haan
Jeffrey B. Rich
Sharon-Lise T. Normand
Cynthia M. Shewan
Rachel S. Dokholyan
Eric D. Peterson
Fred H. Edwards
Richard P. Anderson
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shahian, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, R. P.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shahian, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, R. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Education
Right arrowRelated Article


Report of STS Quality Measurement Task Force

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: Part 1—Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery

David M. Shahian, MDa,*, Sean M. O'Brien, PhDb, Giovanni Filardo, PhD, MPHc, Victor A. Ferraris, MDd, Constance K. Haan, MDe, Jeffrey B. Rich, MDf, Sharon-Lise T. Normand, PhDg, Elizabeth R. DeLong, PhDb, Cynthia M. Shewan, PhDh, Rachel S. Dokholyan, MPHb, Eric D. Peterson, MD, MPHb, Fred H. Edwards, MDe, Richard P. Anderson, MDi,{dagger}

a Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
b Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
c Institute for Health Care Research and Improvement, Baylor Health Care System, Dallas, Texas
d University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Lexington, Kentucky
e University of Florida, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jacksonville, Florida
f Sentara Cardiovascular Research Institute, Norfolk, Virginia
g Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, and Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
h The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois
i Seattle, Washington

* Address correspondence to Dr Shahian, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114 (Email: dshahian{at}partners.org).

Background: The first version of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (STS NCD) was developed nearly 2 decades ago. Since its inception, the number of participants has grown dramatically, patient acuity has increased, and overall outcomes have consistently improved. To adjust for these and other changes, all STS risk models have undergone periodic revisions. This report provides a detailed description of the 2008 STS risk model for coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG).

Methods: The study population consisted of 774,881 isolated CABG procedures performed on adult patients aged 20 to 100 years between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2006, at 819 STS NCD participating centers. This cohort was randomly divided into a 60% training (development) sample and a 40% test (validation) sample. The development sample was used to identify predictor variables and estimate model coefficients. The validation sample was used to assess model calibration and discrimination. Model outcomes included operative mortality, renal failure, stroke, reoperation for any cause, prolonged ventilation, deep sternal wound infection, composite major morbidity or mortality, prolonged length of stay (> 14 days), and short length of stay (< 6 days and alive). Candidate predictor variables were selected based on their availability in versions 2.35, 2.41, and 2.52.1 of the STS NCD and their presence in (or ability to be mapped to) version 2.61. Potential predictor variables were screened for overall prevalence in the study population, missing data frequency, coding concerns, bivariate relationships with outcomes, and their presence in previous STS or other CABG risk models. Supervised backwards selection was then performed with input from an expert panel of cardiac surgeons and biostatisticians. After successfully validating the fit of the models, the development and validation samples were subsequently combined, and the final regression coefficients were estimated using the overall combined (development plus validation) sample.

Results: The c-index for the mortality model was 0.812, and the c-indices for other endpoints ranged from 0.653 for reoperation to 0.793 for renal failure in the validation sample. Plots of observed versus predicted event rates revealed acceptable calibration in the overall population and in numerous subgroups. When patients were grouped into categories of predicted risk, the absolute difference between the observed and expected event rates was less than 1.5% for each endpoint. The final model intercept and coefficients are provided.

Conclusions: New STS risk models have been developed for CABG mortality and eight other endpoints. Detailed descriptions of model development and testing are provided, together with the final algorithm. Overall model performance is excellent.


Related Article

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: Introduction
David M. Shahian and Fred H. Edwards
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009 88: S1. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.