ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:216-226. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.017
© 2009 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Christopher W. Seder
Sang W. Kim
Robert J. Welsh
Gary W. Chmielewski
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seder, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Chmielewski, G. W.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Seder, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Chmielewski, G. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer


Original Articles: General Thoracic

The Safe Transition from Open to Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: A 5-Year Experience

Christopher W. Seder, MDa, Kenny Hanna, MDa, Victoria Lucia, PhDb, Judith Boura, MSb, Sang W. Kim, MDa, Robert J. Welsh, MDa, Gary W. Chmielewski, MDa,*

a Department of Surgery, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan
b Research Institute, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan

Accepted for publication April 2, 2009.

* Address correspondence to Dr Chmielewski, 3577 W 13 Mile Rd, #301, Royal Oak, MI 48073-6769 (Email: gchmielewski{at}beaumont.edu).

Presented at the Fifty-fifth Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Austin, TX, Nov 5–8, 2008.

Background: We hypothesized that established thoracic surgeons without formal minimally invasive training can learn thoracoscopic lobectomy without compromising patient safety or outcome.

Methods: Data were retrospectively collected on patients who underwent pulmonary lobectomy at a single health system between August 1, 2003, and April 1, 2008. Age, sex, pulmonary function tests, preoperative and postoperative stages, pathologic diagnosis, anatomic resection, extent of lymph node sampling, surgical technique and duration, complications, blood loss, transfusion requirement, chest tube duration, length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission, and mortality rate were examined. The percentage of patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy and their outcomes were then compared among three chronologic cohorts.

Results: Three hundred sixty-four patients underwent pulmonary lobectomy (239 open; 99 thoracoscopic; 26 thoracoscopic converted to open). Baseline characteristics, staging, pathologic diagnosis, and anatomic resections were similar in the early, middle, and late cohorts. The percentage of thoracoscopic lobectomies increased from 16% to 49%, whereas open lobectomy decreased from 81% to 42% (p < 0.0001). The complication rate remained constant with the exception of air leaks lasting more than 7 days (9% versus 10% versus 2%; p = 0.02). Hospital length of stay (6 versus 5 versus 4 days; p < 0.0001) and chest tube duration (4 versus 3 versus 3 days; p < 0.0001) decreased and operative duration increased as more thoracoscopic lobectomies were performed. Blood loss, transfusion requirement, 30-day readmission, and 1-year survival were not significantly different among chronologic cohorts.

Conclusions: Established thoracic surgeons can safely incorporate thoracoscopic lobectomy with no increase in morbidity or mortality.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.