HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): David T. Cooke Christine L. Lau Andrew C. Chang Allan Pickens Mark B. Orringer Permission Requests Google Scholar Articles by Cooke, D. T. Articles by Orringer, M. B. PubMed Articles by Cooke, D. T. Articles by Orringer, M. B. Related Collections Esophagus - cancer

---

Hawley H. Seiler Resident Award Paper

Analysis of Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomotic Leaks After Transhiatal Esophagectomy: Risk Factors, Presentation, and Detection

Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Accepted for publication March 6, 2009.

^_* Address correspondence to Dr Orringer, Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 East Medical Center Dr, 2120 Taubman Center, Box 0344, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109 (Email: morrin{at}umich.edu).

Presented at the Fifty-fifth Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Austin, TX, Nov 5–8, 2008.

Background: Transhiatal esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis is a common approach in patients requiring esophagectomy. Factors for developing cervical esophagogastric anastomosis leaks (CEGAL), their presentation, and the value of a routine postoperative screening barium swallow in detecting CEGALs and other complications were analyzed.

Methods: This single-institution retrospective study used medical records and an esophagectomy database to assess results in 1,133 patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy and a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis, 241 for benign disease and 892 for cancer, between January 1996 and December 2006.

Results: Esophagectomy patients who experienced CEGALs included 127 (14.2%) with cancer and 23 (9.5%) with benign disease. Logistic regression analysis identified increasing number of preoperative comorbidities (p < 0.001), active smoking history (p = 0.044), and postoperative arrhythmia (p = 0.002) as risk factors for CEGALs, and a side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis compared with a manually sewn one as protective (p < 0.001). For cancer patients, higher pathologic stage disease (p = 0.050) was a risk factor for CEGALs. For patients with benign disease, a higher number of prior esophagogastric operations (p = 0.007) is a risk factor for CEGALs. Of the 90.7% of CEGALs that occurred on or before postoperative day 10, cervical wound drainage (63.3%) was the most common presenting symptom. Screening barium swallow identified postoperative complications and influenced outcome in 39 patients (3.8%).

Conclusions: Higher number of preoperative comorbidities, advanced pathologic stage, postoperative arrhythmia, an increased number of prior esophagogastric surgeries, and active smoking history are risk factors for developing CEGAL, and a side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis is protective. Screening barium swallow identifies few postoperative complications, but provides quality control.