HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Kohei Yokoi Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sakakura, N. Articles by Mitsudomi, T. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sakakura, N. Articles by Mitsudomi, T. Related Collections Pleura Related Article

---

Original Articles: General Thoracic

Fluid Drainage and Air Evacuation Characteristics of Blake and Conventional Drains Used After Pulmonary Resection

^a Department of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
^b Division of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan

Accepted for publication February 6, 2009.

^_* Address correspondence to Dr Sakakura, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan (Email: nskkr{at}med.nagoya-u.ac.jp).

Background: The Blake drain (BD) has recently begun to be used as a chest tube after pulmonary resection; however, its fluid drainage and air evacuation characteristics remain unclear. We compared the performance of the 19F BD with that of the 32F conventional drain (CD).

Methods: We studied 148 consecutive patients (74 with BD; 74 with CD) who underwent pulmonary resection. Postoperative drainage rates (daily drainage and total drainage) were analyzed to assess fluid drainage. Air evacuation was evaluated to determine whether subcutaneous emphysema or insufficient residual lung expansion developed when air leakage occurred. The BD group was initially managed with water seal or suction, whereas the CD group was managed with water seal. Furthermore, we experimentally measured the evacuation pressure required to expel a constant volume of air through various chest tubes to determine basic air evaluation performance of the tubes.

Results: Drainage rates on the operative day were significantly lower in the BD group than in the CD group, but were similar in both groups on the following day with greater variation in the water-sealed BD group. Among cases with air leakage, air evacuation insufficiency was more frequent in the BD group (16 of 22, 73%) than in the CD group (4 of 17, 24%; p = 0.004). The experiment revealed that air evacuation performance of the 19F BD was equivalent to that of the 12F CD, indicating that the BD requires higher intrathoracic pressure for air evacuation.

Conclusions: Suction is required for the BD to obtain fluid drainage performance comparable to that of the water-sealed CD. When air leakage occurs, air evacuation by the BD tends to be insufficient, irrespective of suction conditions.

Related Article

Invited Commentary

Robert J. Cerfolio
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009 87: 1545. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Fukui, N. Sakakura, R. Kobayashi, T. Katayama, S. Ito, S. Hatooka, and T. Mitsudomi Comparison of methods for placing and managing a silastic drain after pulmonary resection Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2009; 9(4): 645 - 648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Cerfolio Invited commentary. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2009; 87(5): 1545 - 1545. [Full Text] [PDF]