ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:1337-1343. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.03.027
© 2009 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Gary L. Grunkemeier
YingXing Wu
Anthony P. Furnary
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grunkemeier, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Furnary, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Grunkemeier, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Furnary, A. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Education


The Statistician's Page

What is the Value of a p Value?

Gary L. Grunkemeier, PhD, YingXing Wu, MD, MS*, Anthony P. Furnary, MD

Medical Data Research Center, Providence Health & Services, Portland, Oregon

* Address correspondence to Dr Wu, 9205 SW Barnes Rd, Ste 33, Portland, OR 97225 (Email: yingxing.wu{at}providence.org).

Successful publication of a research study usually requires a small p value, typically p < 0.05. Many clinicians believe that a p value represents the probability that the null hypothesis is true, so that a small p value means the null hypothesis must be false. In fact, the p value provides very weak evidence against the null hypothesis, and the probability that the null hypothesis is true is usually much greater than the p value would suggest. Moreover, even considering "the probability that the null hypothesis is true" is not possible with the usual statistical setup and requires a different (Bayesian) statistical approach. We describe the Bayesian approach using a well-established diagnostic testing analogy. Then, as a practical example, we compare the p-value result of a study of aprotinin-associated operative mortality with the more illuminative interpretation of the same study data using a Bayesian approach.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
T. Carrel and L. Englberger
Editorial comment
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2009; 36(5): 875 - 876.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
G. Lindvall, U. Sartipy, S. Bjessmo, P. Svenarud, B. Lindvall, and J. van der Linden
Aprotinin reduces the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2009; 9(2): 178 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.