HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Mitchell J. Magee Syma L. Prince Todd M. Dewey Michael J. Mack Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Magee, M. J. Articles by Mack, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Magee, M. J. Articles by Mack, M. J. Related Collections Coronary disease

---

Original Articles: Adult Cardiac

Fewer Grafts Performed in Off-Pump Bypass Surgery: Patient Selection or Incomplete Revascularization?

^a Cardiopulmonary Research Science and Technology Institute, Dallas, Texas
^b Medical City Dallas Hospital, Dallas, Texas

Accepted for publication December 29, 2008.

^_* Address correspondence to Dr Magee, Medical City Dallas Hospital, 7777 Forest Lane, Suite A-323, Dallas, TX 75230 (Email: mmagee{at}csant.com).

Presented at the Fifty-fourth Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Bonita Springs, FL, Nov 7–10, 2007.

Background: Comparisons of off-pump (OPCAB) versus conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass (CCAB) consistently report fewer grafts per patient with OPCAB. Performing fewer grafts than indicated based on angiographic assessment could result in incomplete revascularization. We questioned whether OPCAB influenced surgeons to perform fewer grafts than needed.

Methods: Preoperative angiographic and surgical data were collected prospectively on 945 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (370 OPCAB, 575 CCAB) at 8 hospitals between February 1, 2004, and July 31, 2004. The number of grafts needed per patient was determined from the reported number of vessels with angiographic stenoses of 50% or greater, and compared with the number received per patient, stratified by coronary artery bypass grafting technique.

Results: The OPCAB and CCAB groups were demographically similar. The mean number of grafts needed per patient was significantly less in the OPCAB group (2.95 versus 3.48), accounting for fewer grafts received in that group (2.75 versus 3.36). The ratio of grafts (received/needed) was the same in both groups. Patients receiving more than three grafts were more likely to have CCAB (71.2%), whereas those receiving fewer than three grafts were almost as likely to have OPCAB as CCAB (55.5%). The rate of 1-year major adverse events (death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization) was the same in OPCAB and CCAB (15.5% versus 14.1%; p = 0.57).

Conclusions: Completeness of revascularization, determined by comparing the number of grafts performed to the number needed, was equivalent in OPCAB and CCAB patients, and 18-month clinical outcomes were equivalent. Preferential selection of patients needing more bypass grafts to CCAB results in the lower mean number of grafts per patient with OPCAB.