HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Victor T. Tsang Mats Johanssen Synnergren Nicholas Kang Marc R. de Leval Martin Utley Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tsang, V. T. Articles by Utley, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Tsang, V. T. Articles by Utley, M. Related Collections Congenital - cyanotic Related Article

---

Original Articles: Pediatric Cardiac

Monitoring Risk-Adjusted Outcomes in Congenital Heart Surgery: Does the Appropriateness of a Risk Model Change With Time?

^a Cardiac Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
^d Clinical Operational Research Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
^b Children's Heart Centre, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
^c Green Lane Cardiothoracic Unit, Auckland, New Zealand

Accepted for publication October 8, 2008.

^_* Address correspondence to Mr Tsang, Cardiac Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Trust, London, WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom (Email: tsangv{at}gosh.nhs.uk).

Background: Risk adjustment of outcomes in pediatric congenital heart surgery is challenging due to the great diversity in diagnoses and procedures. We have previously shown that variable life-adjusted display (VLAD) charts provide an effective graphic display of risk-adjusted outcomes in this specialty. A question arises as to whether the risk model used remains appropriate over time.

Methods: We used a recently developed graphic technique to evaluate the performance of an existing risk model among those patients at a single center during 2000 to 2003 originally used in model development. We then compared the distribution of predicted risk among these patients with that among patients in 2004 to 2006. Finally, we constructed a VLAD chart of risk-adjusted outcomes for the latter period.

Results: Among 1083 patients between April 2000 and March 2003, the risk model performed well at predicted risks above 3%, underestimated mortality at 2% to 3% predicted risk, and overestimated mortality below 2% predicted risk. There was little difference in the distribution of predicted risk among these patients and among 903 patients between June 2004 and October 2006. Outcomes for the more recent period were appreciably better than those expected according to the risk model. This finding cannot be explained by any apparent bias in the risk model combined with changes in case-mix.

Conclusions: Risk models can, and hopefully do, become out of date. There is scope for complacency in the risk-adjusted audit if the risk model used is not regularly recalibrated to reflect changing standards and expectations.

Related Article

Invited Commentary

Jeffrey Phillip Jacobs, David M. Shahian, Marshall L. Jacobs, and Constantine Mavroudis
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009 87: 587-588. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. P. Jacobs, D. M. Shahian, M. L. Jacobs, and C. Mavroudis Invited commentary. Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2009; 87(2): 587 - 588. [Full Text] [PDF]