ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:95-102. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.09.031
© 2009 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Alain Poncelet
Michel Buche
Philippe Noirhomme
Gebrine El Khoury
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Kerchove, L.
Right arrow Articles by El Khoury, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Kerchove, L.
Right arrow Articles by El Khoury, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Great vessels
Right arrow Valve disease
Right arrowRelated Article


Original Articles: Adult Cardiac

Ross Operation in the Adult: Long-Term Outcomes After Root Replacement and Inclusion Techniques

Laurent de Kerchove, MDa,*, Jean Rubay, PhDa, Agnès Pasquet, PhDb, Alain Poncelet, MDa, Caroline Ovaert, PhDc, Manuel Pirotte, MDa, Michel Buche, MDe, William D'Hoore, PhDd, Philippe Noirhomme, MDa, Gebrine El Khoury, MDa

a Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
b Division of Cardiology, Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
c Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
d Division of Biostatistiques, Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
e Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires de Mont-Godinne, Yvoir, Belgium

Accepted for publication September 11, 2008.

* Address correspondence to Dr de Kerchove, Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, Brussels, 1200, Belgium (Email: laurent.dekerchove{at}uclouvain.be).

Background: Dilatation of the pulmonary autograft is a major concern after root replacement for the Ross operation. The inclusion technique would avoid this drawback, but few data are available on the long-term results of this technique. We retrospectively analyze long-term results of both techniques.

Methods: Of 218 patients undergoing the Ross operation between 1991 and 2006, 148 (68%) had root replacement and 70 (32%) underwent the inclusion technique. The mean age of the patients was 40 ± 10 years (range, 16 to 64). Mean follow-up was 94 ± 44 months (range, 13 to 196). Echocardiographic controls were available in 197 patients. Proximal aorta dilatation was defined as diameter > 40 mm.

Results: In the root and inclusion groups, 10-year overall survival was 94% ± 4% and 97% ± 4%, respectively. Freedom from autograft reoperation was 81% ± 10% and 84% ± 13%, respectively. Main cause of reoperation was autograft dilatation in the root group (13 of 16) and valve prolapse in the inclusion group (5 of 6). Freedom from proximal aorta dilatation was 57% ± 12% and 80% ± 15%, respectively. In the root group, dilatations (n = 48) affected systematically the autograft sinuses or sinotubular junction, whereas in the inclusion group, dilatations (n = 10) affected principally the ascending aorta (8 of 10). Freedom from severe autograft regurgitation was 86% ± 9% and 83% ± 13%, respectively. Root technique, follow-up length, and preoperative aortic valve regurgitation were predictors of proximal aorta dilatation.

Conclusions: In the long term, both techniques showed excellent survival and similar rates of autograft failure. For root replacement, autograft dilatation was the main cause of failure. For the inclusion technique, the autograft, but not the ascending aorta, was protected against dilatation and autograft valve prolapse was the main cause of failure.


Related Article

Invited Commentary
Ad J.J.C. Bogers
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009 87: 102. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. W. Brown, M. Ruzmetov, A. Shahriari, M. D. Rodefeld, Y. Mahomed, and M. W. Turrentine
Midterm results of Ross aortic valve replacement: a single-institution experience.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2009; 88(2): 601 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. J.J.C. Bogers
Invited Commentary
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2009; 87(1): 102 - 102.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.