|
|
||||||||
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan
Accepted for publication September 23, 2008.
* Address correspondence to Dr Okamura, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847 Amanuma-cho Omiya-ku Saitama-shi, Saitama, 330-8503, Japan (Email: homareokamura{at}hotmail.co.jp).
Background: When aortic valve replacement is performed in patients with a small aortic annulus, prosthesis–patient mismatch is of concern. Such prosthesis–patient mismatch may affect postoperative clinical status and survival. We investigated the outcomes of isolated aortic valve replacement performed with a 17-mm mechanical prosthesis in patients with aortic stenosis.
Methods: Twenty-three patients with aortic stenosis (mean age, 74.6 ± 6.3 years) underwent isolated aortic valve replacement with a 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent prosthesis. Mean body surface area was 1.41 ± 0.13 m2. Preoperative echocardiography yielded a mean aortic valve area of 0.36 ± 0.10 cm2/m2, a mean left ventricular–aortic pressure gradient of 68.4 ± 25.3 mm Hg, and a mean left ventricular mass index of 200 ± 69 g/m2.
Results: There was no operative mortality, and there were no valve-related events. Echocardiography at 14.0 ± 10.0 months after aortic valve replacement showed a significant increase in the mean effective orifice area index (0.95 ± 0.24 cm2/m2), decrease in the mean left ventricular–aortic pressure gradient (17.4 ± 8.2 mm Hg), and decrease in the mean left ventricular mass index (124 ± 37 cm2/m2). Prosthesis–patient mismatch (effective orifice area index < 0.85 cm2/m2) was present in 8 patients at discharge. In these patients as well as in those without prosthesis–patient mismatch, the left ventricular mass index decreased remarkably during follow-up.
Conclusions: Aortic valve replacement with a 17-mm Regent prosthesis appears to provide satisfactory clinical and hemodynamic results in patients with a small aortic annulus. Remarkable left ventricular mass regression during follow-up was achieved irrespective of the effective orifice area index at discharge.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Garatti, F. Mori, F. Innocente, A. Canziani, P. Gagliardotto, E. Mossuto, T. Santoro, V. Montericcio, A. Frigiola, and L. Menicanti Aortic Valve Replacement With 17-mm Mechanical Prostheses: Is Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch a Relevant Phenomenon? Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2011; 91(1): 71 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Okamura, A. Yamaguchi, K. Noguchi, K. Naito, K. Yuri, and H. Adachi Hemodynamics and Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement with a 17- or 19-mm Valve Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, October 1, 2010; 18(5): 450 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kulik Aortic Root Enlargement: Worth the Effort? Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2010; 90(3): 703 - 705. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sezai, Y. Kasamaki, K. Abe, M. Hata, H. Sekino, K. Shimura, and K. Minami Assessment of the St. Jude Medical Regent Prosthetic Valve by Continuous-Wave Doppler and Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2010; 89(1): 87 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |