HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Gorav Ailawadi Benjamin B. Peeler John A. Kern Lynn M. Fedoruk Irving L. Kron Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ailawadi, G. Articles by Kron, I. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ailawadi, G. Articles by Kron, I. L. Related Collections Valve disease

---

Original Articles: Adult Cardiac

Is Mitral Valve Repair Superior to Replacement in Elderly Patients?

Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia

Accepted for publication March 5, 2008.

^_* Address correspondence to Dr Ailawadi, PO Box 800679, Charlottesville, VA 22908 (Email: gorav{at}virginia.edu).

Presented at the Fifty-fourth Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Bonita Springs, FL, Nov 7–10, 2007.

Background: Mitral valve replacement is more frequently performed and perceived to be equivalent to repair in elderly patients, despite the superiority of repair in younger patients. Our objective was to compare mitral repair to replacement in elderly patients age 75 years or older. Patients younger than 75 years undergoing mitral valve surgery served as a reference population.

Methods: Consecutive elderly patients undergoing operation for mitral regurgitation at our institution from 1998 to 2006 were reviewed. Elderly patients (mean age, 78.0 ± 2.8 years) who underwent mitral repair (n = 70) or replacement (n = 47) were compared with cohorts of young patients (mean age, 58.9 ± 9.3 years) who underwent repair (n = 100) or replacement (n = 98) during the same period. Patient details and outcomes were compared using univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan–Meier analyses.

Results: Mitral replacement in elderly patients had higher mortality than repair (23.4%, 11 of 47 versus 7.1%, 5 of 70; p = 0.01) or as compared with either operation in the reference group (p < 0.0001). Postoperative stroke was higher in elderly replacement patients compared with repair (12.8%, 6 of 47 versus 0%; p = 0.003) or compared with either young cohort (p = 0.02). Compared with elderly repair patients, elderly replacement patients had more cerebrovascular disease (21.3%, 10 of 47 versus 4.3%, 3 of 70; p = 0.005) and rheumatic mitral valves (21.3%, 10 of 47 versus 0%; p = 0.0001). In the young group, overall complication and mortality were no different between replacement and repair. Long-term survival favored repair over replacement in elderly patients (p = 0.04). One elderly repair patient experienced late recurrence of persistent mitral regurgitation.

Conclusions: In patients age 75 years or older, mitral repair is associated with a lower risk of mortality, postoperative stroke, and prolonged intensive care unit and hospital stay compared with mitral replacement. Mitral repair can be performed in preference over replacement even in patients older than the age of 75.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. B. Savage Mitral repair is not superior to replacement in elderly patients. Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2009; 88(1): 348 - 348. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Ailawadi, B. R. Swenson, and I. L. Kron Reply. Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2009; 88(1): 348 - 349. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Kempfert, J. Blumenstein, M. W.A. Chu, P. Pritzwald-Stegmann, T. Kobilke, V. Falk, F. W. Mohr, and T. Walther Minimally invasive off-pump valve-in-a-ring implantation: the atrial transcatheter approach for re-operative mitral valve replacement after failed repair Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2009; 35(6): 965 - 969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]