HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Anthony W. Kim Michael J. Liptay Norman Snow William H. Warren Permission Requests Google Scholar Articles by Kim, A. W. Articles by Warren, W. H. PubMed Articles by Kim, A. W. Articles by Warren, W. H. Related Collections Esophagus - other

---

Original Articles: General Thoracic

Utility of Silicone Esophageal Bypass Stents in the Management of Delayed Complex Esophageal Disruptions

^a Department of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
^b Department of General Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
^c Department of Surgery, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois
^d John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois

Accepted for publication February 13, 2008.

^_* Address correspondence to Dr Warren, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W Harrison St, Suite 774, Chicago, IL 60612 (Email: william_warren{at}rush.edu).

Presented at the Fifty-fourth Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Bonita Springs, FL, Nov 7–10, 2007.

Background: The objective of this study was to review the clinical experience of temporarily placing an endoesophageal silicone salivary bypass stent and its value in managing patients with life-threatening esophageal disruptions.

Methods: Clinical records of patients undergoing placement of silicone Montgomery salivary bypass stents from June 1998 to September 2007 were reviewed. Seventeen patients had a proven esophageal disruption in the absence of malignancy and with life-threatening sepsis refractory to conventional management. Underlying conditions were iatrogenic trauma from prior pulmonary surgery (4 patients), significant anastomotic leaks after an esophagogastrectomy (4 patients), delayed presentation (> 24 hours) of a perforated esophagus (4 patients), leak after esophageal surgery (3 patients), and esophagobronchial fistula secondary to inflammation and infection (2 patients). Stents were placed without securing, were sutured in place to the esophageal wall at the time of thoracotomy, or were secured by bringing holding sutures through the nostrils and tied over the bridge of the nose.

Results: In all cases, placement of the esophageal stent led to prompt improvement of the leak and, within a week, improvement of the sepsis. Supportive measures were continued after placement of the stent. Sixteen patients overcame the sepsis with ultimate healing of the esophageal disruption (13 patients) or maturation of the perforation into a chronic fistula (3 patients). Endoscopic stent removal was performed 2 to 16 weeks after placement. No patient had a stricture develop at the disruption site. One patient died of ruptured thoracic aorta.

Conclusions: Silicone salivary bypass stents serve as an effective way of diverting and excluding the oral-alimentary stream, thereby providing optimal conditions for sepsis control. They are a useful adjunct in the management of complex esophageal conditions.