HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): David P. Mason Sudish C. Murthy Gösta B. Pettersson Eugene H. Blackstone Permission Requests Google Scholar Articles by Mason, D. P. Articles by Blackstone, E. H. PubMed Articles by Mason, D. P. Articles by Blackstone, E. H. Related Collections Lung - transplantation

---

Original Articles: General Thoracic

Spirometry After Transplantation: How Much Better Are Two Lungs Than One?

^a Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
^b Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
^c Department of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

Accepted for publication December 4, 2007.

^_* Address correspondence to Dr Mason, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave / Desk F24, Cleveland, OH 44195 (Email: masond2{at}ccf.org).

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine how much double lung transplantation improves lung function over single lung transplantation and to identify predictors of lung function after transplantation.

Methods: From February 1990 to November 2005, 463 adults underwent lung transplantation. Among 379 of these patients (82%), 6372 evaluations of postoperative normalized forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were analyzed using longitudinal temporal decomposition methods for repeated continuous measurements. We characterized the time course of postoperative spirometry, compared it between double and single lung transplantation, and identified its modulators.

Results: FEV₁ (% of predicted) was only somewhat better after double than single lung transplantation (65%, 58%, and 59% vs 51%, 43%, and 40% at 1, 3, and 5 years, p = 0.03), as was FVC (% of predicted) (67%, 68%, and 66% vs 62%, 56%, and 51%, p < 0.0001). Both FEV1% and FVC% increased sharply to 1 year. For double lung transplantation, these values persisted, with minimal decline to 5 years; but for single lung transplantation, they continuously declined to 5 years. Values for double lung transplantation remained higher than for single lung transplantation at all time points but never approached twice the value. Patients undergoing double lung transplantation for emphysema had the highest postoperative FEV1% and FVC%, but also the lowest values for single lung transplantation; the benefit of double lung transplantation was between these values for other diagnoses.

Conclusions: Spirometry weakly favors double lung over single lung transplantation. The advantage of spirometry values alone may not justify double lung transplantation.