ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:880-884. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.10.050
© 2008 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eda, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshida, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eda, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshida, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease
Right arrowRelated Article


Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Transplantation of the Free Gastroepiploic Artery Graft for Myocardial Revascularization: Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Results

Tadahito Eda, MD*, Akio Matsuura, MD, Ken Miyahara, MD, Haruki Takemura, MD, Sadanari Sawaki, MD, Teruaki Yoshioka, MD, Naoki Yoshida, MD

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Aichi Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Aichi, Japan

Accepted for publication October 12, 2007.

* Address correspondence to Dr Eda, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Aichi Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, 2135 Kariyasuka, Yamato Ichinomiya, Aichi, 491-0934, Japan (Email: cdb57810{at}hkg.odn.ne.jp).

Background: Use of the free gastroepiploic artery (GEA) graft for coronary revascularization is not very popular because of its tendency to vasospasm. We hypothesize that the cause of free GEA spasm is graft damage caused by an interruption of venous drainage from the graft. To overcome this problem, we anastomosed the accompanied gastroepiploic vein to the right atrial appendage simultaneously with the GEA grafting in the aortocoronary position. We here assess the clinical result and the angiographic patency of the free GEA graft in our method in the late postoperative period.

Methods: Between January 1997 and April 2001, 57 patients underwent coronary artery grafting with a free GEA using our method. A total of 169 distal anastomoses (average 2.96) were constructed. The free GEA grafts were anastomosed to the main right coronary artery in 26 patients, right coronary artery branch in 27, left anterior descending artery in 1 patient, high lateral branch in 2 patients, and circumflex branch in 2. The mean clinical follow-up is 77 months (range, 35 to 110) in 57 cases, and the angiographic follow-up averages 77 months (range, 37 to 110) in 46 cases.

Results: There was no cardiac death, and all patients were in Canadian Cardiovascular Society class II or less. The mean 77-month patency rate of the free GEA in our method was 95.7%. The patency rates of internal thoracic artery, radial artery, and saphenous vein graft in the same period were respectively 93.2%, 100%, and 81.3%.

Conclusions: Free GEA grafting with venous drainage for myocardial revascularization provided excellent long-term performance.


Related Article

Invited Commentary
Hendrick B. Barner
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008 85: 884. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
H. B. Barner
The right coronary artery: which graft and how to use it?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 26, 2012; (2012) ezr308v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
T. Eda, K. Miyahara, H. Oshima, A. Usui, A. Matsuura, and Y. Ueda
En-Bloc Free Gastroepiploic Artery Graft provides a good Long-Term Patency Rate
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, June 1, 2010; 18(3): 244 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. B. Barner
Invited Commentary
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 884 - 884.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.