ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:474-480. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.09.047
© 2008 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Herko Grubitzsch
Wolfgang Konertz
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grubitzsch, H.
Right arrow Articles by Konertz, W.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Grubitzsch, H.
Right arrow Articles by Konertz, W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology - arrhythmias

Original Articles: Cardiovascular

The Role of Atrial Remodeling for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Herko Grubitzsch, MD*, Alexandro Menes, MD, Diethelm Modersohn, MD, PhD, Wolfgang Konertz, MD, PhD

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany

Accepted for publication September 25, 2007.

* Address correspondence to Dr Grubitzsch, Klinik für Kardiovaskuläre Chirurgie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité-Platz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany (Email: herko.grubitzsch{at}charite.de).

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) causes electrical, contractile, and structural remodeling of the atria. We investigated remodeling in patients undergoing AF ablation.

Methods: Concomitant ablation of permanent AF, lasting 1 to 240 months, was performed in 73 patients (49.3% men) with a mean age of 66 ± 9.1 years undergoing mitral valve operations. Electrical (AF cycle length from surface electrocardiogram), contractile (force of contraction measured at right atrial muscle bundles), and structural (left atrial [LA] diameter from echocardiography) remodeling was assessed. Predictors for rhythm outcome were determined.

Results: Two patients died perioperatively, and 3 died during follow-up. The deaths were not ablation related. At the last follow-up (mean, 12 ± 6.9 months), 47 patients (71.2%) were in sinus rhythm, 41 (62.1%) without antiarrhythmic drugs. Corresponding to cycle length (126 to 247 ms), force (2 to 18 mN/mm2), and LA diameter (37 to 79 mm), atrial remodeling exhibited a wide interindividual variability but no correlation between different remodeling levels. No relationship was found between remodeling and AF duration or LA hemodynamic load. Univariate analysis demonstrated higher force (7 ± 4.2 vs 4 ± 2.8 mN/mm2, p = 0.078), smaller LA diameter (51 ± 7.1 vs 58 ± 10.2 mm, p < 0.05), and shorter AF duration (34 ± 48.7 vs 73 ± 63.0 months, p < 0.05) associated with successful sinus rhythm restoration, whereas logistic regression analysis revealed AF duration (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 1.02, p = 0.045) and LA diameter (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.23, p = 0.016) as predictors.

Conclusions: Atrial remodeling exhibited a high interindividual variability but no relationship within different remodeling levels, with AF duration or with LA hemodynamic load. However, AF duration and structural remodeling, but not electrical or contractile remodeling, predicted rhythm outcome.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.